City comparison
Bakersfield, CA is about 1,700 miles (2,800 km) from Chicago, IL in a straight line. By road, the drive is roughly 2,200 miles, or about 36 hours (about 4 days at 10 h/day) behind the wheel at highway speeds.
Driving distance is a rough estimate (great-circle × 1.25); driving time assumes a 60 mph blended average. Real trips run 10–20% longer with stops.
A direct flight from Bakersfield, CA to Chicago, IL takes about 3 h 29 min, covering roughly 1,700 miles in a straight line. Connecting itineraries with a layover typically add 1–3 hours.
Block-to-block estimate at ~500 mph cruise, including taxi, climb, and descent — what an airline would publish, not pure airborne time.
Bakersfield, CA is on Pacific Time and Chicago, IL is on Central Time — a 2-hour difference. When it's noon in Bakersfield, it's 2 p.m. in Chicago, which puts Bakersfield 2 hours behind.
Standard-time offsets. Daylight saving applies in both cities for most of the year (exceptions: Hawaii and most of Arizona), and the gap between the two stays the same.
Chicago has a population of 2,721,914, vs 404,321 in Bakersfield — about 6.7× larger by population. By land area, Chicago covers about 230 sq mi vs 150 sq mi for Bakersfield.
Population from US Census ACS. Land area from the Census Gazetteer (city proper, excluding inland water).
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Bakersfield | Chicago | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,283/mo | $1,314/mo | 2.4% higher in Chicago |
| Median home value | $320,600 | $304,500 | 5.3% higher in Bakersfield |
| Median household income | $73,827 | $71,673 | 3.0% higher in Bakersfield |
| Groceries index | 105.1 | 106.4 | 1.2% higher in Chicago |
| Utilities index | 155.3 | 84.4 | 84.0% higher in Bakersfield |
| Transportation index | 100.7 | 100.3 | ≈ equal (Bakersfield slightly higher) |
| Healthcare index | 100.6 | 100.2 | ≈ equal (Bakersfield slightly higher) |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Bakersfield, you'd need $102,140 in Chicago to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Bakersfield, CA is about 2.1% cheaper overall than Chicago, IL, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 22% higher in Chicago than in Bakersfield. If you earn $80,000 in Bakersfield, you'd need about $81,712 in Chicago to keep the same standard of living.