City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Aurora | Chicago | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,462/mo | $1,314/mo | 11.3% higher in A |
| Median home value | $241,600 | $304,500 | 20.7% lower in A |
| Median household income | $85,943 | $71,673 | 19.9% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 96.3 | 97.2 | 0.9% lower in A |
| Utilities index | 91.7 | 92.4 | 0.7% lower in A |
| Transportation index | 96.9 | 98.6 | 1.8% lower in A |
| Healthcare index | 99.1 | 97.4 | 1.7% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Aurora, you'd need $89,879 in Chicago to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Chicago, IL is about 10.1% cheaper overall than Aurora, IL, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 10% lower in Chicago than in Aurora. If you earn $80,000 in Aurora, you'd need about $71,903 in Chicago to keep the same standard of living.