City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Shakopee | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,791/mo | $1,417/mo | 26.4% higher in A |
| Median home value | $822,600 | $348,300 | 136.2% higher in A |
| Median household income | $76,244 | $103,924 | 26.6% lower in A |
| Groceries index | 105.8 | 101.0 | 4.8% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 135.7 | 93.0 | 46.0% higher in A |
| Transportation index | 103.2 | 102.2 | 1.0% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 104.2 | 102.8 | 1.4% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need $80,137 in Shakopee to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Shakopee, MN is about 19.9% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 31% lower in Shakopee than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need about $64,110 in Shakopee to keep the same standard of living.