City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Rialto | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,791/mo | $1,553/mo | 15.3% higher in A |
| Median home value | $822,600 | $418,300 | 96.7% higher in A |
| Median household income | $76,244 | $80,750 | 5.6% lower in A |
| Groceries index | 104.0 | 105.3 | 1.2% lower in A |
| Utilities index | 82.4 | 127.0 | 35.1% lower in A |
| Transportation index | 100.5 | 107.0 | 6.1% lower in A |
| Healthcare index | 104.0 | 107.2 | 3.0% lower in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need $98,317 in Rialto to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Rialto, CA is about 1.7% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 13% lower in Rialto than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need about $78,654 in Rialto to keep the same standard of living.