City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Moorhead | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,791/mo | $997/mo | 79.6% higher in A |
| Median home value | $822,600 | $234,300 | 251.1% higher in A |
| Median household income | $76,244 | $68,680 | 11.0% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 105.8 | 95.8 | 10.4% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 135.7 | 81.7 | 66.2% higher in A |
| Transportation index | 103.2 | 93.0 | 11.0% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 104.2 | 93.7 | 11.3% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need $66,355 in Moorhead to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Moorhead, MN is about 33.6% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 50% lower in Moorhead than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need about $53,084 in Moorhead to keep the same standard of living.