City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Edmond | Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,257/mo | $1,791/mo | 29.8% lower in A |
| Median home value | $304,700 | $822,600 | 63.0% lower in A |
| Median household income | $96,389 | $76,244 | 26.4% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 100.7 | 104.0 | 3.1% lower in A |
| Utilities index | 98.1 | 82.4 | 19.1% higher in A |
| Transportation index | 85.8 | 100.5 | 14.6% lower in A |
| Healthcare index | 101.1 | 104.0 | 2.7% lower in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Edmond, you'd need $121,157 in Los Angeles to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Edmond, OK is about 17.5% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 30% lower in Edmond than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Edmond, you'd need about $96,926 in Los Angeles to keep the same standard of living.