City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Pittsburg | San Francisco | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $2,134/mo | $2,316/mo | 7.9% lower in A |
| Median home value | $555,200 | $1,348,700 | 58.8% lower in A |
| Median household income | $98,408 | $136,689 | 28.0% lower in A |
| Groceries index | 104.8 | 93.4 | 12.3% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 146.0 | 139.5 | 4.7% higher in A |
| Transportation index | 101.6 | 92.3 | 10.1% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 101.4 | 86.0 | 17.9% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Pittsburg, you'd need $108,954 in San Francisco to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Pittsburg, CA is about 8.2% cheaper overall than San Francisco, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 22% lower in Pittsburg than in San Francisco. If you earn $80,000 in Pittsburg, you'd need about $87,163 in San Francisco to keep the same standard of living.