City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Omaha | Warner Robins | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,099/mo | $1,094/mo | 0.5% higher in A |
| Median home value | $210,300 | $159,000 | 32.3% higher in A |
| Median household income | $70,202 | $63,678 | 10.2% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 101.2 | 98.8 | 2.4% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 87.4 | 95.6 | 8.6% lower in A |
| Transportation index | 90.0 | 82.5 | 9.1% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 89.8 | 96.0 | 6.4% lower in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Omaha, you'd need $99,091 in Warner Robins to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Warner Robins, GA is about 0.9% cheaper overall than Omaha, NE, based on our cost-of-living index. If you earn $80,000 in Omaha, you'd need about $79,273 in Warner Robins to keep the same standard of living.