City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Waterbury | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,791/mo | $1,140/mo | 57.1% higher in A |
| Median home value | $822,600 | $162,800 | 405.3% higher in A |
| Median household income | $76,244 | $51,451 | 48.2% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 104.0 | 93.1 | 11.7% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 82.4 | 89.1 | 7.5% lower in A |
| Transportation index | 100.5 | 81.3 | 23.5% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 104.0 | 83.8 | 24.0% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need $75,070 in Waterbury to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Waterbury, CT is about 24.9% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 36% lower in Waterbury than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need about $60,056 in Waterbury to keep the same standard of living.