City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Victoria | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,791/mo | $1,094/mo | 63.7% higher in A |
| Median home value | $822,600 | $176,900 | 365.0% higher in A |
| Median household income | $76,244 | $64,832 | 17.6% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 105.8 | 95.2 | 11.1% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 135.7 | 88.1 | 54.0% higher in A |
| Transportation index | 103.2 | 97.5 | 5.8% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 104.2 | 95.8 | 8.8% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need $65,708 in Victoria to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Victoria, TX is about 34.3% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 54% lower in Victoria than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need about $52,566 in Victoria to keep the same standard of living.