City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Los Angeles | Tuckahoe | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,791/mo | $1,388/mo | 29.0% higher in A |
| Median home value | $822,600 | $396,300 | 107.6% higher in A |
| Median household income | $76,244 | $89,920 | 15.2% lower in A |
| Groceries index | 105.8 | 97.3 | 8.7% higher in A |
| Utilities index | 135.7 | 90.9 | 49.3% higher in A |
| Transportation index | 103.2 | 99.2 | 4.0% higher in A |
| Healthcare index | 104.2 | 97.5 | 7.0% higher in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need $75,533 in Tuckahoe to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Tuckahoe, VA is about 24.5% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 37% lower in Tuckahoe than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Los Angeles, you'd need about $60,426 in Tuckahoe to keep the same standard of living.