City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Kyle | Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,572/mo | $1,791/mo | 12.2% lower in A |
| Median home value | $271,000 | $822,600 | 67.1% lower in A |
| Median household income | $85,199 | $76,244 | 11.7% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 95.2 | 105.8 | 10.0% lower in A |
| Utilities index | 85.9 | 135.7 | 36.7% lower in A |
| Transportation index | 97.5 | 103.2 | 5.5% lower in A |
| Healthcare index | 95.8 | 104.2 | 8.1% lower in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Kyle, you'd need $123,916 in Los Angeles to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Kyle, TX is about 19.3% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 25% lower in Kyle than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Kyle, you'd need about $99,132 in Los Angeles to keep the same standard of living.