City comparison
Cost indices by category, with the US city average (100) marked.
Index: 100 = US city average. Lower is more affordable.
Side-by-side costs, salaries, and sub-category indices.
| Metric | Attleboro | Los Angeles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median rent | $1,359/mo | $1,791/mo | 24.1% lower in A |
| Median home value | $378,900 | $822,600 | 53.9% lower in A |
| Median household income | $91,378 | $76,244 | 19.8% higher in A |
| Groceries index | 98.3 | 105.8 | 7.2% lower in A |
| Utilities index | 134.0 | 135.7 | 1.3% lower in A |
| Transportation index | 100.4 | 103.2 | 2.7% lower in A |
| Healthcare index | 103.0 | 104.2 | 1.2% lower in A |
How much you'd need to earn in the other city to keep the same standard of living.
If you earn $100,000 in Attleboro, you'd need $124,905 in Los Angeles to maintain your standard of living.
Climate, safety, and demographics side by side.
Attleboro, MA is about 19.9% cheaper overall than Los Angeles, CA, based on our cost-of-living index. Housing costs are roughly 35% lower in Attleboro than in Los Angeles. If you earn $80,000 in Attleboro, you'd need about $99,924 in Los Angeles to keep the same standard of living.